Criticism of Allameh Tabatabai's claim in the Qur'an to be a Qur'an, Al-Mizan's method of interpretation

Ghazanfari, Ali

doi:10.22034/sshq.2025.469557.1482

Criticism of Allameh Tabatabai's claim in the Qur'an to be a Qur'an, Al-Mizan's method of interpretation

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Author

ali ghazanfari

Associate Professor of Quranic Sciences and Education University, Faculty of Quranic Sciences, Tehran

10.22034/sshq.2025.469557.1482

Abstract

There is no doubt about the greatness of al-Mizan's commentary and its qualitative superiority over many commentaries, but in any case, the separation of the hadiths in this commentary has caused some people to look at it with ambivalence and put it in front of mutawaari hadiths. They agree between the Qur'an and hadiths. This article, with a descriptive and analytical approach and with documentary and library methods and gathering the opinions of scholars, has tried to criticize the basics of the interpretation method of the Qur'an to the Qur'an and the peculiarities of this theory among the exegetical methods, and then analyze the interpretation method of al-Mizan. Then, what Allameh Tabataba'i has practically dealt with in the commentary, he has criticized and examined and finally by presenting evidences, he has reached the point that Al-Mizan's commentary is considered a type of comprehensive commentary, and although the author claims that the verses He interpreted with the help of verses, but the spirit of hadiths was involved in his interpretation

Keywords

" exegetical methods"

"Qur'an to Qur'an interpretation"

"Allameh Tabatabai"

"Al-Mizan exegesis"

Subjects