Stylistics Studies of the Holy Quran

Stylistics Studies of the Holy Quran

Conceptualizing the name of the map "The Hereafter is the Court" Based on the conceptual metaphor theory of Lakoff and Johnson

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master student of Arabic language and literature at Persian Gulf University
2 Associate Professor of Arabic Language and Literature Department, Persian Gulf University,
3 Associate Professor, Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Persian Gulf University
1022034/sshq.2022.326122.1140
Abstract
Conceptual metaphor in the approach of cognitive semantics, which is a branch of cognitive linguistics, is one of the main mechanisms of the thought process and is a tool for expressing abstract concepts in the form of objective and tangible concepts. One of the applications of conceptual metaphors is their use as a tool for analysis and worldview of texts, especially religious and Quranic texts. The Holy Qur'an, with its metaphorical nature, has presented to humanity a very complex concepts of the unseen and abstract things, such as the abstract concept of the Hereafter, in a simple, recognizable and tangible language. This letter is one of the most suitable metaphorical patterns to depict the resurrection, which is one of the places of the great resurrection of the Hereafter. Mapping the source domain to the destination domain forms the main framework of the present study. This research intends to conceptualize the concept of "the hereafter is a court" with a descriptive-analytical approach and based on Likoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory, and examines the systematic correspondences between familiar and tangible concepts of origin and abstract and transcendental concepts of the afterlife. It is unknown to explain the correspondences between the structural elements of the territory of origin and destination.
Keywords

Subjects


  • The Holy Quran.
  • Payandeh, Abolqasem (Bi-Ta): "Nahj al-Fasahah" , Misplaced, Fafaqat School Library, Publisher: World of Knowledge.
  • Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar (2006): "Dehkhoda Medium Dictionary­", Tehran: Institute of Publications and Printing, University of Tehran.
  • Rikor, Paul (December 2007): "Metaphor and creation of new meanings in language", translated by Hossein Naghavi. Marefat Magazine, 16, No. 120, pp.  
  • Salehi Hajiabadi, Nematollah (2010 OR 2010): "Man from Hashr to the Court of the Resurrection," Qom: Flowers of Heaven.   8th edition.
  • ­Ghaeminia, Alireza (2018): "Conceptual Metaphors and Spaces of the Qur'an", Tehran: Islamic Culture and Thought Research Institute Publications Organization, 2nd edition.
  • Qomi, Shaykh Abbas (2007): "Houses of Al-Akhara", Qom: Imama Publications Institute, 5th edition.
  • Kuchess, Zoltan (2015): "Metaphor in Culture": Translated by Nikta Entezam, Tehran: Siahroud Publications, 1st edition.
  • Scholars, Reza (2010): "Dad or the Trial of the Resurrection," Qom: Ekram.
  • Makarem Shirazi, Nasser et al. (1998 or 1998): "Message of the Qur'an (Exegesis of theMatic Example)," Tehran: Dar al-Katab Islamiyah, 5th edition.
  • Ibn Ashour, Mohammed Taher (1200C): "Liberation and Enlightenment", Lebanon: The Arab Tarekh Mousse, First Edition.
  • Bouamrani, Mohamed Al-Saleh (2009): "Theoretical and Applied Studies in Customary Semantics", Tunisia_Sfax: Darnhi, First Edition.
  • Tusi, Mohammed bin Hassan (1177), "Amali", Qom: Dar al-Culture.
  • Abdul Baqi, Mohammed Fouad (1375C): "Indexed Dictionary", Cairo: Egyptian House of Books.
  • Sherif Radhi, Abu Al-Hassan Mohammed bin Al-Hassein (1431 A.D.): "The approach of rhetoric (is the sum of what  Sharif al-Radhi chose  from the words of our Master, The Prince of believers, Ali bin Abi Talib A)," Qom: Musasa al-Rafid Publications, First Edition.
  • Al-Kashani, Mohammed bin Al-Murtada, called Mawla Mohsen (Latarich): "The white argument in the lullaby of the ehéa", Tehran: the book of the saduk.
  • Majlisi, Mohammed Bagir (History): "Bahr al-Anwar", Beirut_Lebanon: The Foundation of Loyalty to the Great House of Modesty.
  • Barcelona, Antonio. (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie. (2006). Cognitive Linguistic: an introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Grady, J. E. (2007). “Metaphor” in Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.188-213.
  • Kövecses, Zoltan. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford Univercity Press. Second Edition.
  • Lakoff, G. (1993), “The contemporary theory of metaphor”,In Geeraerts, Dirk (Ed.). (2006) Cognitive linguistics: basic readings (Cognitive linguistics research; 34). Mouton de Gruyter Berlin, New York, pp. 185-238.
  • Lakoff, George &  Johnsen Mark. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
Volume 4, Issue 2 - Serial Number 7
Fourth year, first issue, seventh consecutive, autumn and winter 2021
January 2021
Pages 303-319

  • Receive Date 24 November 2021
  • Revise Date 05 February 2022
  • Accept Date 07 February 2022
  • Publish Date 21 December 2020