Stylistics Studies of the Holy Quran

Stylistics Studies of the Holy Quran

Evaluating the similarities and differences between Rumi's style and the Quranic stories of the prophets in the Masnavi with the commentary of Al-Mizan

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student in Quran and Hadith Sciences, Arak University, Faculty of Humanities
2 , Professor of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran
3 Associate Professor of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Arak University (Consultant)
4 Professor of Quran and Hadith Sciences,Arak University, Faculty of Humanities
Abstract
Abstract:
Stories have an inexhaustible capacity to convey deep and precise meanings and concepts in an attractive and effective manner. Among them, the Quranic stories of the prophets have a special place due to their connection and citation to the eternal source of revelation. Rumi and Allama Tabataba'i consider Quranic stories as a tool for guiding humans and a source of lessons for human nations and societies. They introduce the Quran as the main and most important source and reference for the stories of the divine prophets. And they believe that in order to understand the Quran, the Quran itself must be used. Therefore, considering this commonality of their views in understanding the process of the Quranic verses using the Quran itself, the present study aims to evaluate the similarities and differences of Rumi's style in the Masnavi and Allama's style in Al-Mizan in relation to the Quranic stories of the prophets Yunus, Ayyub and Idris (peace be upon them). The findings of the study indicate that Rumi and Allama Tabataba'i's views were common on most of the topics surrounding the prophets studied, except that there were differences of opinion and perceptions regarding the quality of the affliction of Prophet Ayyub (AS) and the issue of the geographical elevation of Prophet Yunus (AS).
Keywords

Subjects



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 19 April 2026

  • Receive Date 25 October 2025
  • Revise Date 15 March 2026
  • Accept Date 31 January 2026
  • Publish Date 19 April 2026