The findings indicate that Verse 136 of al-Baqarah, given its context among the verses discussing the dispute of the People of the Book with the Muslims and their claim of superiority, necessitates the use of the plural address “Qūlū” (Say ye) as a response from the Muslims to the People of the Book. The generality of this address leads to the subsequent mention of the preposition of termination “Ilā” (to) – due to the ultimate destination of the revelation being the people – and consequently the repetition of “Ūtīya” (was given) – considering the general audience and the necessity of elaboration.
In contrast, Verse 84 of Āli ʻImrān is placed in a context where, on the one hand, it addresses the confrontation between the People of the Book and the Prophet (PBUH). Consequently, to respond to and reject their statement, there is a need to glorify the Prophet (PBUH) and begin the verse with the singular address “Qul” (Say thou/you [singular]). On the other hand, within the same context, just as a covenant was taken from other prophets in confirmation of each other, this covenant is also taken separately from the Prophet of our Ummah (community), which further emphasizes the singular address. This address, and its emphasis on the Prophet’s responsibility and the direct descent of revelation upon him, results in the selection of the preposition of superimposition “ʿAlā” (upon/on) and the final omission of “Ūtīya” due to his specific status and the lack of need for expansion of the